<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- <br>
Hash: SHA256 <br>
<br>
Google and so is not too conducive to caching the end user. One
problem anymore - one less, what's the difference? When we begin to
beat - start to cry. In general, the year in IT - eternity. During
this time, everything can happen. So relax, cousin. Nothing else
happened. ;)<br>
<br>
PS. A magic bullets - does not exist. You have forgotten that some
governments are willing to carry out globally SSL Bump over its
citizens. This is a separate issue for everyone, not just for these
citizens. So quietly celebrate Halloween and do not ride the wave :)<br>
<br>
01.11.2016 4:41, Yuri Voinov пишет:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">><br>
> When the future comes - then we will worry. What wonder,
then?<br>
><br>
> October 2017 is not tomorrow.<br>
><br>
><br>
> 01.11.2016 4:13, L. A. Walsh пишет:<br>
> > Google is pushing this for all websites by October 2017<br>
><br>
> > One issue to be "caught" are subordinated CA certs that
can<br>
> > allow one vector for generating certs accepted by
browsers w/o<br>
> > importing any new certs.<br>
><br>
> > Some of the info on the cert page:<br>
><br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.certificate-transparency.org/what-is-ct">https://www.certificate-transparency.org/what-is-ct</a><br>
><br>
> > Seems to indicate that site-local generated and imported<br>
> > certs may also be detected as invalid and be disallowed
for<br>
> > SSL connection approvals. That would be a major pain
given<br>
> > google's actions that seem to be hostile to end-user (or<br>
> > end-site) web-caching.<br>
> > (saw this on<br>
>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/10/31/google_certificate_transparency/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/10/31/google_certificate_transparency/</a><br>
> > ).<br>
><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > squid-users mailing list<br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a><br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users">http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users</a><br>
><br>
></span><br>
<br>
- -- <br>
Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them.<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
<br>
Version: GnuPG v2
<br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYF8ooAAoJENNXIZxhPexG+VAH/15vFPprneESrl94A2iOrHo4
<br>
2JoAy0Fqi7mJjuSjSNOhW3O2AutJkrPMDMTg8FEso999wI/HsuRCWqaMLpQU/7dv
<br>
hzA3BwegOrELBXb5x5YPXP8FgMkN6Wytcy9nOkU6Hn/s3u3QP8zUqLWFbLGqnMoF
<br>
PSJuCbNA3m8IOf7WP2nF3824KLM3AMkByQ2XszS7TnP4LxYIIYh+0mcJ7oSqaLxo
<br>
oMCDCknfu0FcISl1MVxQQVIpVqxfNnzBxFrBVK2ZJ5mDgeyB0+dQjULpRO0IDGDL
<br>
PRQeUAgyREEejfuJLpoE+ufwT9SkTyxm6WZUZiJgOEnueNdxc5wox0jJpOX+5bY=
<br>
=zXZ1
<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>