<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- <br>
Hash: SHA256 <br>
<br>
You can have slow DNS. Consider to use local caching DNS recursor as
source for proxy & users.<br>
<br>
23.10.2016 18:42, Krishna Kulkarni пишет:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">><br>
> Hi Antony,<br>
> Thanks for the reply. I have made changes in squid.conf as
per your suggestion and have allocated 20 GB of Hard disk space.<br>
> Squid server at my location handles http/https requests for
more than 500 hosts. But at peak hours squid usually performs very
slow and browser takes 1-2 minutes just to serve google home page
and more time than that for heavy web page.<br>
> I have verified network link utilization & found it
consumes not more than 15 mb whereas link bandwidth is of 45mb but
still squid serves web pages very slow to client hosts.<br>
> Any suggestions in squid configuration to overcome this issue
would be highly appreciated.<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Krishna.<br>
><br>
> On Oct 23, 2016 5:11 PM,
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org></a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> Send squid-users mailing list submissions to<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
><br>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users">http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users"><http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users></a><br>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
><br>
> You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users-owner@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users-owner@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users-owner@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users-owner@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
><br>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is
more specific<br>
> than "Re: Contents of squid-users digest..."<br>
><br>
><br>
> Today's Topics:<br>
><br>
> 1. Slowness in Squid (Krishna Kulkarni)<br>
> 2. Re: Slowness in Squid (Antony Stone)<br>
> 3. external_acl_type problem (reinerotto)<br>
> 4. Re: Slowness in Squid (Yuri Voinov)<br>
> 5. Re: Slowness in Squid (Matus UHLAR - fantomas)<br>
> 6. Re: Slowness in Squid (Yuri Voinov)<br>
><br>
><br>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 1<br>
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:06:22 +0530<br>
> From: Krishna Kulkarni <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:krishna26kulkarni@gmail.com">krishna26kulkarni@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:krishna26kulkarni@gmail.com"><mailto:krishna26kulkarni@gmail.com></a>><br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
> Subject: [squid-users] Slowness in Squid<br>
> Message-ID:<br>
>
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CAN-hqth-kdQDYXTR=jDnbVoiNmEMpi71+Sx7waO=61s0keucDQ@mail.gmail.com">CAN-hqth-kdQDYXTR=jDnbVoiNmEMpi71+Sx7waO=61s0keucDQ@mail.gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:61s0keucDQ@mail.gmail.com"><mailto:61s0keucDQ@mail.gmail.com></a>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
><br>
> Dear Team<br>
> I am new to squid.. I have installed squid 3.5 on CentOS
6.7. As a<br>
> configuration part, I have kept most of the things
default. Please advice<br>
> on how to allocate cache memory of 20 GB to squid. I got
to know that, more<br>
> cache memory would increase performance of squid..<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Krishna<br>
> -------------- next part --------------<br>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
> URL:
<<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/9ddd4442/attachment-0001.html">http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/9ddd4442/attachment-0001.html</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/9ddd4442/attachment-0001.html"><http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/9ddd4442/attachment-0001.html></a>><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 2<br>
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:16:28 +0200<br>
> From: Antony Stone <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it">Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it"><mailto:Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it></a>><br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slowness in Squid<br>
> Message-ID:
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:201610231016.28867.Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it">201610231016.28867.Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:201610231016.28867.Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it"><mailto:201610231016.28867.Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it></a>><br>
> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"<br>
><br>
> On Sunday 23 October 2016 at 05:36:22, Krishna Kulkarni
wrote:<br>
><br>
> > I am new to squid.. I have installed squid 3.5 on
CentOS 6.7. As a<br>
> > configuration part, I have kept most of the things
default. Please advice<br>
> > on how to allocate cache memory of 20 GB to squid.<br>
><br>
> Do you mean cache memory, or disk cache?<br>
><br>
><br>
> If you mean memory (RAM) and you have enough of this in
your system (eg: 32<br>
> Gbytes or more), then find the section in squid.conf
which starts with:<br>
><br>
> # MEMORY CACHE OPTIONS<br>
><br>
> And read about the tag "cache_mem".<br>
><br>
> To set this value (normally 256 Mbytes) to 20 Gbytes,
set:<br>
><br>
> cache_mem 20 GB<br>
><br>
><br>
> If, on the other hand, you do not mean memory, but you
mean disk cache, then<br>
> find the section in squid.conf with starts with:<br>
><br>
> # TAG: cache_dir<br>
><br>
> and read that section.<br>
><br>
> Pay particular attention to the line which says:<br>
><br>
> # cache_dir ufs Directory-Name Mbytes L1 L2
[options]<br>
><br>
> And then later there is an example:<br>
><br>
> # cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid3 100 16 256<br>
><br>
> Uncomment that line and change the 100 (Megabytes) in
that line to 20000 (for<br>
> 20 Gigabytes) and perhaps also adjust the 16 to something
like 64 or even 256<br>
> - for a large cache you don't want a few directories with
lots of entries<br>
> each, so it's worthwhile creating lots of directories to
keep the number of<br>
> files in each down.<br>
><br>
> > I got to know that, more cache memory would increase
performance of squid..<br>
><br>
> What do you mean by "performance"?<br>
><br>
><br>
> Antony.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Just when you think you're done, a cat floats by with
buttered toast strapped<br>
> to its back.<br>
><br>
> - Steve Krug, "Don't make me think"<br>
><br>
> Please
reply to the list;<br>
>
please *don't* CC me.<br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 3<br>
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 03:39:31 -0700 (PDT)<br>
> From: reinerotto <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:augustus_meyer@gmx.net">augustus_meyer@gmx.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:augustus_meyer@gmx.net"><mailto:augustus_meyer@gmx.net></a>><br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
> Subject: [squid-users] external_acl_type problem<br>
> Message-ID: <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:1477219171447-4680203.post@n4.nabble.com">1477219171447-4680203.post@n4.nabble.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:1477219171447-4680203.post@n4.nabble.com"><mailto:1477219171447-4680203.post@n4.nabble.com></a>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<br>
><br>
> 1)<br>
> According to<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/external_acl_type/">http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/external_acl_type/</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/external_acl_type/"><http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/external_acl_type/></a><br>
><br>
> in squid.conf, this<br>
><br>
> external_acl_type check_delay ttl=0 cache=0 %SRC
/etc/squid/check_delay.sh<br>
><br>
> should start 0 helpers immediately after squid (3.5.22)
start-up.<br>
> However, I always see 5.<br>
><br>
> 2)<br>
> I often see this:<br>
> Sat Oct 22 23:51:18 2016 user.alert syslog: The
check_delay helpers are<br>
> crashing too rapidly, need help!<br>
> Sat Oct 22 23:51:18 2016 local4.notice squid[21677]:
Squid Parent: (squid-1)<br>
> process 27685 exited with status 1<br>
><br>
> Still trying to trace down the problem, I notice, that in
this case some<br>
> helpers still kept alive, although<br>
> I expect them to be killed, too, in case squid-1 exits.<br>
><br>
><br>
> I need to add, that I am running squid on an embedded
system, cross-compiled<br>
> for MIPS.<br>
> So there _might_ be some assumptions made for "standard
LINUX" squid, which<br>
> are not true in my case.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> View this message in context:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/external-acl-type-problem-tp4680203.html">http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/external-acl-type-problem-tp4680203.html</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/external-acl-type-problem-tp4680203.html"><http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/external-acl-type-problem-tp4680203.html></a><br>
> Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.<br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 4<br>
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:15:53 +0600<br>
> From: Yuri Voinov <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:yvoinov@gmail.com">yvoinov@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:yvoinov@gmail.com"><mailto:yvoinov@gmail.com></a>><br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slowness in Squid<br>
> Message-ID:
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ebf2c080-b508-9547-a9df-d7971df609a4@gmail.com">ebf2c080-b508-9547-a9df-d7971df609a4@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ebf2c080-b508-9547-a9df-d7971df609a4@gmail.com"><mailto:ebf2c080-b508-9547-a9df-d7971df609a4@gmail.com></a>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
><br>
><br>
> Keep in mind - a huge in-memory cache does not always give
the<br>
> acceleration. Moreover, in most cases you can get the
opposite effect<br>
> expected. It is a common misconception - that the giant
memory cache<br>
> will give a giant performance gain.<br>
><br>
><br>
> 23.10.2016 9:36, Krishna Kulkarni пишет:<br>
><br>
> > Dear Team<br>
> > I am new to squid.. I have installed squid 3.5 on CentOS
6.7. As a<br>
> configuration part, I have kept most of the things default.
Please<br>
> advice on how to allocate cache memory of 20 GB to squid. I
got to know<br>
> that, more cache memory would increase performance of squid..<br>
><br>
> > Thanks,<br>
> > Krishna<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > squid-users mailing list<br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
> > <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users">http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users"><http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users></a><br>
><br>
><br>
> -------------- next part --------------<br>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
> URL:
<<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/607405d9/attachment-0001.html">http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/607405d9/attachment-0001.html</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/607405d9/attachment-0001.html"><http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/607405d9/attachment-0001.html></a>><br>
> -------------- next part --------------<br>
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
> Name: 0x613DEC46.asc<br>
> Type: application/pgp-keys<br>
> Size: 2437 bytes<br>
> Desc: not available<br>
> URL:
<<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/607405d9/attachment-0001.key">http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/607405d9/attachment-0001.key</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/607405d9/attachment-0001.key"><http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/607405d9/attachment-0001.key></a>><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 5<br>
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:37:04 +0200<br>
> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:uhlar@fantomas.sk">uhlar@fantomas.sk</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:uhlar@fantomas.sk"><mailto:uhlar@fantomas.sk></a>><br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slowness in Squid<br>
> Message-ID: <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:20161023113704.GA12924@fantomas.sk">20161023113704.GA12924@fantomas.sk</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:20161023113704.GA12924@fantomas.sk"><mailto:20161023113704.GA12924@fantomas.sk></a>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed<br>
><br>
> On 23.10.16 17:15, Yuri Voinov wrote:<br>
> >Keep in mind - a huge in-memory cache does not always
give the<br>
> >acceleration. Moreover, in most cases you can get the
opposite effect<br>
> >expected. It is a common misconception - that the
giant memory cache<br>
> >will give a giant performance gain.<br>
><br>
> doesn't that imply kind of effectiveness?<br>
><br>
> >23.10.2016 9:36, Krishna Kulkarni пишет:<br>
> >> I am new to squid.. I have installed squid 3.5
on CentOS 6.7. As a<br>
> >configuration part, I have kept most of the things
default. Please<br>
> >advice on how to allocate cache memory of 20 GB to
squid. I got to know<br>
> >that, more cache memory would increase performance of
squid..<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:uhlar@fantomas.sk">uhlar@fantomas.sk</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:uhlar@fantomas.sk"><mailto:uhlar@fantomas.sk></a> ; <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.fantomas.sk/">http://www.fantomas.sk/</a><br>
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this
address.<br>
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek
reklamnu postu.<br>
> The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.<br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Message: 6<br>
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 17:40:46 +0600<br>
> From: Yuri Voinov <<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:yvoinov@gmail.com">yvoinov@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:yvoinov@gmail.com"><mailto:yvoinov@gmail.com></a>><br>
> To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slowness in Squid<br>
> Message-ID:
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:790ee9e7-f646-d14a-1213-a3729e30d90f@gmail.com">790ee9e7-f646-d14a-1213-a3729e30d90f@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:790ee9e7-f646-d14a-1213-a3729e30d90f@gmail.com"><mailto:790ee9e7-f646-d14a-1213-a3729e30d90f@gmail.com></a>><br>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
><br>
><br>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
> Hash: SHA256<br>
><br>
> This effect is good known to all who have worked with
relational<br>
> databases. In fact, it is typical in general for all
caches except<br>
> purpose-built highly scalable systems.<br>
><br>
><br>
> 23.10.2016 17:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas пишет:<br>
> > doesn't that imply kind of effectiveness?<br>
><br>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
> Version: GnuPG v2<br>
><br>
>
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYDKG+AAoJENNXIZxhPexGv9IH/A+T/eimJHaIkzY4oyDjbM9Z<br>
>
fiDZyJPKoQz3uEDCS1qu+xxm33aol+IXFfE6L9ksuTUDwhzVnfw+m1aeEKv0NbBR<br>
>
ODUL6dUhHnSmKWQ4TjDG/nXaQHK7QQDy+uqeIdZe1P9WHdGJ0qNDKwtCV2mD9hHH<br>
>
QHg9Ukx7ycYDNAxxBvFfieOIhRfemuh8L+Z7Ne7nrmE6yGW+UCZze1/HfipYdFHH<br>
>
IAiMO87icjbdd//EcLvhupMAQIBvSBMdehHsri+eHS/hwId2aWGtE/eqRovi8ITe<br>
>
pPS2xKRC4H1IpzuMMNy0xCGsZ4UZ/vVN8fL0OhMX+VSX48RRN0C2GA1giFcNUAM=<br>
> =wnN6<br>
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
><br>
> -------------- next part --------------<br>
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
> Name: 0x613DEC46.asc<br>
> Type: application/pgp-keys<br>
> Size: 2437 bytes<br>
> Desc: not available<br>
> URL:
<<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/327fc190/attachment.key">http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/327fc190/attachment.key</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/327fc190/attachment.key"><http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20161023/327fc190/attachment.key></a>><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> Subject: Digest Footer<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> squid-users mailing list<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org"><mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org></a><br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users">http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users"><http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users></a><br>
><br>
><br>
> ------------------------------<br>
><br>
> End of squid-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 82<br>
> *******************************************<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> squid-users mailing list<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a><br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users">http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users</a></span><br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
<br>
Version: GnuPG v2
<br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYDLqcAAoJENNXIZxhPexGfR8IAISoTylwJrRlHtJtMzV8JDBe
<br>
PTs0xLIUd6wtpmVmIfKy/rU1MhKzeShRuoWZ3YHVG7NurSZvYm0B9EMBweh8Xrly
<br>
f4YUgwABCXzzy78UgJsmGLVPhRLlORDV7PQys+PAT2MHHL32l4geDUOfVWZ5gv6/
<br>
2GEQhH5rYHWeHcVqUpsVyoYfHB3y13t9hdYWEg7k32ZDik8IIVbfV2q+uW0WQjVj
<br>
FC4j6599louhwfVCqePJM3hQwycuEqRO8fD/oQwv1jr6x2+4Y71bjm4lbM0HiuKu
<br>
byFlnHrhdtD6m5UkQgSzC+PhG2jho02G56IeP20E8HONhwJJLH5/pCrkIAhjmW8=
<br>
=J44M
<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>