[squid-users] Is there any squid 4.x tested with Delay pools to work and limit well ?

Dr.X 0xff1f at gmail.com
Mon Apr 10 22:41:49 UTC 2023


Hi Alex , it seems we have bad news . FYI , 3.x is working fine  .

So do you think we will have squid 4.x to be fixed soon or latter ?


Best ,


From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov at measurement-factory.com>
Date: Monday, 10 April 2023 04:31
To: squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org <squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org>
Cc: Dr.X <0xff1f at gmail.com>, Dave Blanchard <dave at killthe.net>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Is there any squid 4.x tested with Delay pools to work and limit well ?
On 4/8/23 15:35, Dave Blanchard wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 16:40:02 +0000
> Dr.X <0xff1f at gmail.com> wrote:

>> I was wondering if you have a Squid 4.x version that supports delay
>> pools and is not buggy. I asked Alex, the developer, and he
>> informed me that none of the 4.x versions support it. I also
>> reached out to Amos but haven't received a response yet.


> I'm interested in this also, as I've just tried setting up delay
> pools on 5.4 and so far haven't managed to make it work as expected.


I would like to clarify delay pools support status, again: For some
traffic, some delay pools configurations are probably working OK in
Squid v4+. The Squid bug Dr.X has been referring to above (and in other
recent squid-user emails) is Bug 4913 (Delay Pools don't work for
Tunneled traffic):

* https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4913

* http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2022-June/024922.html

* http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2023-April/025725.html


HTH,

Alex.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20230410/5456cadd/attachment.htm>


More information about the squid-users mailing list