[squid-users] FW: Encrypted browser-Squid connection errors

Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar at fantomas.sk
Tue Oct 25 09:03:25 UTC 2022


>>I do not know exactly what you mean by "https proxy" in this context, but 
>> I suspect that you are using the wrong FireFox setting.  The easily 
>> accessible "HTTPS proxy" setting in the "Configure Proxy Access to the 
>> Internet" dialog is _not_ what you >need!  That setting configures a 
>> plain text HTTP proxy for handling HTTPS traffic.  Very misleading, I 
>> know.
>
>>You need a PAC file that tells FireFox to use an HTTPS proxy.
>
>>See (again)
>>https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/HTTPS#Encrypted_browser-Squid_connection
>>which refers to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378637#c68

skip my previous e-mail

On 24.10.22 15:48, LEMRAZZEQ, Wadie wrote:
>Indeed, I am aware of this bug discussion and I did apply the PAC script 
> into network.proxy.autoconfig_url, and it did not work

perhaps syntax error in that script you have pasted?

I assume you pasted exactly text as mentioned on:
http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2022-October/025315.html
or:
https://webproxy.diladele.com/docs/network/secure_proxy/browsers/


>And what's more misleading is that the bug is tagged resolved, as if 
> starting from firefox 33, it supports https proxy out of the box

yes, by using PAC script, or perhaps an extention that configures it 
instead. foxyproxy was mentioned iirc

>But anyway, my next step is to use a PAC file, since it is the legacy 
> method, if this doesn't work either I'm gonna use stunnels

I know nothing of autoconfig being legacy.


-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I intend to live forever - so far so good.


More information about the squid-users mailing list