[squid-users] Getting the full file content on a range request, but not on EVERY get ...

Yuri Voinov yvoinov at gmail.com
Thu May 12 20:09:52 UTC 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
If a hammer, all, of course, is the nails :)

13.05.16 2:08, Yuri Voinov пишет:
>
> In comparison, the cache of thousands of Linux distributions,
regardless of the purpose, of course, a trifle :)
>
> 13.05.16 2:07, Yuri Voinov пишет:
>
>
>       > I recently expressed the idea of caching torrents using
>       SQUID. :) What's an idea! I'm still impressed! :)
>
>
>
>       > 13.05.16 2:02, Yuri Voinov пишет:
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > Updates,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > in conjunction with hundreds OS's and distros,
>       better to do
>
>       >       with
>
>
>
>       >       > separate dedicated update server. IMHO.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > 13.05.16 1:56, Hans-Peter Jansen пишет:
>
>
>
>       >       > > On Freitag, 13. Mai 2016 01:09:39 Yuri Voinov
>       wrote:
>
>
>
>       >       > >> I suggest it is very bad idea to
>       transform caching
>
>       >       proxy to linux
>
>
>
>       >       > >> distro's or something else archive.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > > Yuri, if I wanted an archive, I would mirror
>       all stuff
>
>       >       and use local
>
>
>
>       >       > repos.
>
>
>
>       >       > It was sarcasm. And yes - local mirror is the best
>       approach.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > > I went that route for a long time - it's a
>       lot of work
>
>       >       to keep up
>
>
>
>       >       > everywhere,
>
>
>
>       >       > > and generates an awful amount of traffic (and
>       I did it
>
>       >       the sanest way
>
>
>
>       >       > possible
>
>
>
>       >       > My condolences.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > > - with a custom script, that was using
>       rsync..)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > >> As Amos said, "Squid is a cache, not an
>       archive".
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > > Yes, updating 20 similar machines makes a
>       significant
>
>       >       difference with the
>
>
>
>       >       > > squid as a deduplicated cache - with no
>       recurring work
>
>       >       at all.
>
>
>
>       >       > Agree. Partially. With Solaris I've does it one
>       JumpStart
>
>       >       network
>
>
>
>       >       > server..... Of course, the same technology is rara
>       avis in
>
>       >       modern
>
>
>
>       >       > world.... :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > I now wonder - to sharpen the pencil you too
>       millstone ask?
>
>       >       :)  My
>
>
>
>       >       > condolences again.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       >       > > Pete
>
>
>
>       >       > >
>       _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>       >       > > squid-users mailing list
>
>
>
>       >       > > squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
>
>
>
>       >       > >
>       http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXNOMQAAoJENNXIZxhPexGQiQIAMX1XwoIr6WVtoSTpG8Jf8Vy
+8jdMQzGMvG7DUkd+PUXu/b28HqcKm5yyTh8LkBt1tPYfetv5VBIY21yN8G/48Rb
U9C+yYeLzQVUxikd5muel9G19khJ7XXqzJHSBNtPzlyN8+ylNX9TFFhmJZu4s6sq
el05x/xtmlNkrW4AIbYF4Zz5HVxOResJS7yCvAuQw7LB010Hwed1PYyFw2baKVRO
BZkiG8E8kxTPT6j+KB/nFZC2l0qmblPa2Tk3sjhKkngJx5rSbKTomZI075KRQilv
VJgdYNp8/hDlvGszpi0/PSV8onia0ekF8jYU/7fkTsYqRJJ1P9G5f4ezZcr4Bos=
=MaNc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20160513/866c4ac3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x613DEC46.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 2437 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20160513/866c4ac3/attachment-0001.key>


More information about the squid-users mailing list