[squid-users] URL too large??

Eliezer Croitoru eliezer at ngtech.co.il
Tue Dec 13 20:05:38 UTC 2016


Hey Yuri,

It's not right that the Internet is 4*8K in the urls.
It's just that it happens that some of the Internet users abuse their options to enter something in the browser.
Most browsers doesn't support more then 16k and the number which was mentioned was 100K++ so it's either not HTTP or something else.

If you are managing a network like a soho this is a very nice restriction to have 8k or 16k and in some cases 24k limit for a url maximum size.
The defaults are defaults but depends on the applications which are being used the choice of the defaults or special compiled version would change.

Eliezer
----
http://ngtech.co.il/lmgtfy/
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: eliezer at ngtech.co.il


From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-bounces at lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf Of Yuri Voinov
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 9:46 PM
To: squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] URL too large??

It means exactly what it said: URL too long.
In Squid's defaults set 8k for URL size. This was reasonable maximum 10 years ago.
Now it seems too small (at least 4 times) because of now Internet full of adware bullshit (referrals/trackers/counters etc.) which is often more 8k.
You can easy fix it (if you worry about it. It seems for end-user like hang/broken links) if you build squid from source. Just change vaule MAX_URL in src/defines.h and recompile.
But if you do this, beware - some things become slower, and danger of deinal of service exists.
That's it.
WBR, Yuri

14.12.2016 1:05, Odhiambo Washington пишет:
I did not dig deep into it I couldn't scan the access log for it because I had no idea what 'too long' meant. 
I will ignore it until someone says they're unable to access a website, and they can give me details of what it is.


On 13 December 2016 at 19:51, Eliezer Croitoru <mailto:eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote:
I think that the maximum size was 64k and it's way above this. 
It should not be an issue if this is some weird application creating some random url which doesn't have meaning.
But if you know what is creating such a url it's a whole another story.
Can you reproduce\recreate this url?

Eliezer

----
Eliezer Croitoru
Linux System Administrator
Mobile+WhatsApp: +972-5-28704261
Email: mailto:eliezer at ngtech.co.il


On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Odhiambo Washington <mailto:odhiambo at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, 

Saw this on my cache.log (squid-3.5.22, FreeBSD-9.3,):

2016/12/13 11:47:55| WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): (1) Operation not permitted
2016/12/13 11:47:55| WARNING: no_suid: setuid(0): (1) Operation not permitted
2016/12/13 11:47:55| HTCP Disabled.
2016/12/13 11:47:55| Finished loading MIME types and icons.
2016/12/13 11:47:55| Accepting NAT intercepted HTTP Socket connections at local=[::]:13128 remote=[::] FD 39 flags=41
2016/12/13 11:47:55| Accepting HTTP Socket connections at local=[::]:13130 remote=[::] FD 40 flags=9
2016/12/13 11:47:55| Accepting NAT intercepted SSL bumped HTTPS Socket connections at local=[::]:13129 remote=[::] FD 41 flags=41
2016/12/13 11:47:55| Accepting ICP messages on [::]:3130
2016/12/13 11:47:55| Sending ICP messages from [::]:3130
2016/12/13 11:53:25| urlParse: URL too large (11654 bytes)


-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223
"Oh, the cruft."




-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223
"Oh, the cruft."



_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-- 
Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them.



More information about the squid-users mailing list