[squid-users] Squid4 has extremely low hit ratio due to lacks of ignore-no-cache
yvoinov at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 17:46:05 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This should be understood as "Life Saving handiwork of drowning." Or "We
change something, but you sort it out, how to fix it, it's the Open
So, finally, there is no answer.
PS. If developers do not know - the more we do not know and can not know.
26.10.15 23:34, Alex Rousskov пишет:
> On 10/26/2015 11:19 AM, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>> 4.0.1 has more than 4 times
>> bigger mem_cache, 1 Gb. 1st example 3.5.10 has only 256 Mbytes. This is
>> the reason of miss??????
> Please see my previous email if you want to improve your chances of
> getting a correct answer to that and other related questions.
> In summary: Squid logs why it made an immediate-hit, immediate-miss, or
> revalidate-and-then-decide decision. There are approximately 100 factors
> that affect that decision. If you want folks to speculate, keep posting
> questions. If you want an answer, collect and share those logs.
> And, yes, Squid needs a better interface for triaging caching decisions
> than studying detailed cache.logs. You already know what to do to add
> that very useful feature:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the squid-users