[squid-users] Some questions about ssl_bump.

Amos Jeffries squid3 at treenet.co.nz
Tue Nov 17 20:33:27 UTC 2015

On 18/11/2015 9:24 a.m., Bruce Markey wrote:
> Amos,
> I knew something wasn't right.
> Ok then I'm going to start there.  I had a heck of a time getting
> squidguard to even work due to its reliance on old berkely db packages, I'd
> be happy to see it go.
> So that being said. I'm going to lose squidguard.  Upgrade squid to 3.5.
> I haven't even looked at the 3.5 stuff.  How big of a config change am I
> looking at?  That being said, upgrade or start fresh?

For the ssl_bump lines yes. They operate very differently, with a bit of
a learning curve around the recursive/repeated ssl_bump processing.

The rest of the config change should be smooth if it was working well
with 3.3. "squid -k parse" can highlight the differences there.

> Thanks again. This is the first definitive answer I've gotten!.



More information about the squid-users mailing list