[squid-users] Some questions about ssl_bump.
squid3 at treenet.co.nz
Tue Nov 17 20:33:27 UTC 2015
On 18/11/2015 9:24 a.m., Bruce Markey wrote:
> I knew something wasn't right.
> Ok then I'm going to start there. I had a heck of a time getting
> squidguard to even work due to its reliance on old berkely db packages, I'd
> be happy to see it go.
> So that being said. I'm going to lose squidguard. Upgrade squid to 3.5.
> I haven't even looked at the 3.5 stuff. How big of a config change am I
> looking at? That being said, upgrade or start fresh?
For the ssl_bump lines yes. They operate very differently, with a bit of
a learning curve around the recursive/repeated ssl_bump processing.
The rest of the config change should be smooth if it was working well
with 3.3. "squid -k parse" can highlight the differences there.
> Thanks again. This is the first definitive answer I've gotten!.
More information about the squid-users