[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[David Touzeau]

Your are right fred,

It is is a difficult deal for us too...

aufs -> good speed but more troubles ( assertion failed, "empty()", HTTP 
reply without date.... unstable rock system ) and must deal with squid 
crashes ( watchdog)

diskd -> more stable but slower...



Le 15/07/2015 12:46, FredB a écrit :
> Just a little word about aufs, just for information, to avoid
>
> squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
> squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
> squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
> squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
>
>
> I had increase this value (sorry I can't remember the exact number)
>
>        --with-aufs-threads=xxx
>
> But the "load average" - top counter - was very important and I should back to diskd
> So only diskd could works good (rock store was worst than aufs ...), with my load and my usage, but perhaps I should test with a more recent version
>
> Tested on Debian
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users