[squid-users] Fw: Squid 32-bit (2.7.2) much faster than Squid 64-bit (3.5.11)
squid3 at treenet.co.nz
Fri Dec 11 13:47:05 UTC 2015
On 11/12/2015 10:16 p.m., TarotApprentice wrote:
> Sorry should have replied to the list.
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>> From: Tarot Apprentice
>> Looking at the startup logs the 3.4.11 says "store logging disabled" (it had an error) so would account for some of the difference.
So the builds are different:
* OS integration:
Squid-2 builds from Acme being made with Visual Studio. So they have
native Windows API integration.
Squid-3 builds by Diladele are using Cgwin. So a whole OS abstraction
layer between Squid and Windows.
* HTTP 1.x:
Squid-2 is HTTP/1.0-only.
Squid-3 does HTTP/1.1 and does a whole lot more protocol processing to
detect whether 1.1 features are being used.
As you already said 32-bit vs 64-bit. I read some research recently that
showed 64-bit is only faster in benchmarks when there is hardware layer
retardation being applied to emulating the 32-bit operations on the same
hardware. So YMMV.
Squid-2 has less features than Squid-3.5. It also has less of them
enabled by default. YMMV.
- This includes IPv6 support. Squid-3 waits for both IPv4 and IPv6
responses from DNS. Squid-2 will not be doing that.
The configs are different:
Squid-2 is configured to use the Windows Registry DNS servers (default).
Squid-3 is explicitly configured with dns_nameservers to override that
to use only a sub-set of the Registry listed NS.
- if that one DNS server is running much faster than the others it can
account for a lot of speed variance.
Squid-2 is using a 100MB disk cache + 64MB RAM cache.
Squid-3 is using only a 256MB RAM cache.
- Usually this should count against Squid-2 in most traffic. But if
your Squid are processing objects over 4MB size, then Squid-2 has the
advantage of storing them to HDD and fast-ish HITs later. Where Squid-3
has to MISS.
>> On 11 Dec 2015, at 12:16 PM, Patrick Flaherty wrote:
>> Just following up on my slow 3.5.11 Squid server. I loaded the 32-bit 2.7.2 version on the same box and it’s so much faster for me. Its 4 to 5 times faster for me on the same machine. Please any help appreciated. Amos, I think I cleaned up my 3.5.11 squid.conf properly. I think my 2.7.2 squid.conf needs work.
>> See below Startup Cache logs from both 3.5.11 and 2.7.2 and also the squid.conf files from 3.5.11 and 2.7.2.
Both configs look roughly equivalent to me. Except the Squid-3 config
defines localnet as being "all" then does an "allow localnet". Making it
an open proxy. The Squid-2 is at least restricted to the whitelist domains.
Though I dont think that is affecting your results. Uunless someone
figured out how to open a tunnel through it already and is using up the
bandwidth with an not-yet-logged huge transaction.
More information about the squid-users