[squid-users] Question on throughput

[Jacques Kruger]

Thanks - at least I can now start to plan for the future.

Regards,

Jacques

-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz] 
Sent: 15 October 2014 01:48 PM
To: Jacques Kruger; squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Question on throughput

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 16/10/2014 12:36 a.m., Jacques Kruger wrote:
> Thanks for the information.
> 
> I'll do some further testing and confirm that the CPU isn't the 
> bottleneck in this case. The machine is a bit long in the tooth but 
> with the faster connection this could easily be the issue.
> 
> As a general rule, am I correct in sticking with 2.7 for performance 
> or is the current focus on squid3?


2.7 was officially deprecated by 3.2. In both features and performance. Improvements will only be done on 3.x versions.

Amos
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUPl8FAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjagEH/1kRT7+n2Cnoq33QXnytbuMM
QkHRBaXZzeNrMQ8Jz+ofktjAo1H3fXn2Gp8yZ/uU1T8nHoJ1NfB2PfFH7ZDm1cc4
aWGkMH8xA2YfURWsdDCufGuqElfYTJjrgxhg68aq6XXeXBIWq5y+M4GbLlI0zq5C
VI5HFjao2nm2qz+mf1Ba0XwHjR/JfNRDI/fSwpgVw8hLRFFhaHCL2ydHvWoDdeNk
I58AdgCC/Aea4NYN/B08YaNDffjMlNZ12/PrS4/e2zPi9yPwN5ijv4Xn27woEOk7
Cwu3fQNST6tRPdXFE3c/k7Ty6eebcUK84btDiJOClz7rZiiqYYkIHdx+sl7KOwc=
=xzIe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----