[squid-dev] squid.conf future

Francesco Chemolli gkinkie at gmail.com
Sat Feb 29 11:07:07 UTC 2020


I like the idea of markdown, if possible.
It is simple and gets the job done.
Would processing it be more cumbersome than the alternatives?

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 8:43 PM Alex Rousskov <
rousskov at measurement-factory.com> wrote:

> On 2/25/20 1:31 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions of formats I should look at then?
>
> I believe cf.data.pre should use two primary formats, each optimized
> specifically for the content it is applied to. The secondary details of
> each format will evolve, but here is where I would start today:
>
> 1. YAML-like metadata to supply formal details about each directive. We
> already use this today, and I expect no significant changes in the
> immediate future (even though many improvements are possible in this
> area!).
>
> 2. Markdown for informal documentation inside DOC_START...DOC_END,
> DEFAULT_DOC, and similar text blocks. Preprocessing includes validation
> of internal references (for sure), generation of internal anchors
> (probably), and removal of minimal common indentation (not sure; need to
> experiment/discuss). Other preprocessing actions may be desirable as
> well, of course. An agreement on the lower-level details and a
> non-trivial conversion effort would be required. We can discuss whether
> to do it incrementally or once-and-for-all.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Alex.
> _______________________________________________
> squid-dev mailing list
> squid-dev at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
>


-- 
    Francesco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-dev/attachments/20200229/66a1f8d5/attachment.html>


More information about the squid-dev mailing list