[squid-dev] RFC Sourcelayout for clientStreams

[Amos Jeffries]

I've been looking at the clientStreams objects and moving them to a
library for the SourceLayout project.

What I would like feedback on before I go and make a namespace and
library up is whether we want to retain the term "Client Streams" as the
name for that component or whether there is a better name?

* Maybe 'Body' from the BodyProducer/Consumer objects which are the two
main endpoints of a clientstream so far.

* Maybe 'DataFlow' from the idea that it is for handling opaque data,
and also the HTTP/2 frame name for the bytes transferred this way is DATA.

Any other ideas or keep ClientStreams?

Amos