[squid-dev] A question about delay pools.

[Amos Jeffries]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 23/12/2014 6:37 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> 
> OK if you are not aware of that then I'm not the only one that day 
> dreaming.
> 
> Eliezer
> 
> On 12/23/2014 05:10 AM, Kinkie wrote:
>> I am not aware of any such plan; delay pools offer different use 
>> cases than QOS and it wouldn't make any sense to drop them.
>> 
>> Francesco
> 

The delay pools code is adding an annoying amount of complexity to the
comm I/O logics and byte accounting is hard to get right and currently
very buggy. QoS does almost all the same behavioural things much more
effectively.

I'm trying to see if we can get to a place where pools removal is a
possibility by diverting people to using QoS wherever it makes sense
to do so.

Amos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUmQiPAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjDQUH/1YNwRD1d1fFt8HHowy5NOiZ
aoNMzr32MMzDg9FZaOuc5PbbGCu7vcZpb2z6sElgtXKwncU63NXrLedrgymxtWBK
vFVTLs3y1sXP/53fEYk6784gcA6AviJlVuAO0ChEcORY52f8wtAitwsE+CducOYD
dBgSLPM1RniGOoBmmKXLShS3x+kj5O8V8vXJnCv72fzXobzg9jj9tia5BW8q5oc4
USqixu9lwD/HS027DwriZpru2Y4XyJw+gJRWe/xR81tXTg/Y5AXYrG1MqzYcD3XT
NMZHpcJ1zLiqdFHsp2WG1m/SbF2gqjM84em1vLR31oEFhv/D8+s9UEAYJobYcvA=
=6l6z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----